| 
    
         
          |   | 
          
               
                  
                  Case Study: Subscriptions 
                   
                  Situation: Newspaper was thinking of a $0.40 per 
                  week increase in pricing since they had not had a 7 day increase 
                  in 4 years. K Group recommended a smaller increase that produced 
                  $1.4 million in incremental revenue and no loss in circulation. 
                  If the client had increased prices $0.40 per week as planned, 
                  they would have lost 29,000 in circulation and lost $2.5 million 
                  in revenue. The net gain to the client was $3.9 million ($1.4 
                  mm gain versus a $2.5 mm loss)  
                  The return: 48x investment 
                   
                  Situation: Newspaper was converting 
                  to office pay and was concerned about losing circulation. The 
                  GM believed that the market would sustain a rate increase, but 
                  shared the concern of the circulation department regarding the 
                  30,000 remaining carrier collect subscribers. A new subscription 
                  term was added which was more appealing to carrier collect households 
                  and the rate was lowered for two of the original four subscription 
                  lengths. Circulation grew by 5000 copies (2%) in the face of 
                  a rate increase while circulation revenue grew by 7%.  
                  The return: 27x investment 
                   
                  Situation: Newspaper 
                  had 7-day and Sunday-Only subscriptions. The publisher was opposed 
                  to any type of weekender product for fear of 7-day cannibalization. 
                  The Circulation Director had been unsuccessful over his 4 year 
                  tenure in convincing his boss to adopt a weekender product. 
                   
                  We found that the publisher was correct in his fear of the weekender 
                  subscription. Based on current 7-day and Sunday-Only subscription 
                  rates, the range of acceptable prices for a 3-day introduction 
                  was very narrow: 
                  1.) Weekly rate at which Ex-7-day Subscribers 
                  would prefer a 3-day: $2.35/wk or less 
                  2.) Weekly rate at which Current 7-day subs 
                  would switch to 3-day: $2.75/wk or less 
                  3.) Weekly rate at which current Sunday-Only 
                  would switch to 3-day: $3.00/wk or less 
                   
                  K Group recommended that the 3-day rate had to fall between 
                  $3.00 and $2.75/wk, otherwise cannibalization of current 7-day 
                  subscribers would offset the gains of a new 3-day subscription 
                  type. 
                   
                  This strategy predicted an increase of 15,000 weekenders with 
                  less than 2,000 7-day subscriptions cannibalized. To date the 
                  paper has achieved a 12,000 increase in 3-day subscriptions 
                  with losses of about 1,200 7-day subscribers. The net increase 
                  in Sunday circulation (over 10,000) resulted in a $500,000 pre-print 
                  revenue increase and a 3-day circulation revenue increase of 
                  $1.6 million.  
                  The return: 42x investment 
                   
                  Situation: The newspaper had taken 
                  rate increases in 4 of the past 5 years. After completing a 
                  pricing model K Group determined that even a small increase 
                  ($0.05 per week) would cause major erosion in the base circulation. 
                  A full analysis of the entire market showed that the introductory 
                  price in half of the market was too low. Increasing the introductory 
                  pricing had only a negligible impact on take-rate and produced 
                  $900,000 in incremental revenue. 
                  The return: 12x investment 
                   
                  >> Back to Top 
                   
                         | 
               
              | 
         
        |